Introduction: We report the results of augmented anastomotic repair (AAR) in the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 71 consecutive patients who had undergone AAR between June 2004 and June 2013. Medical records were reviewed to identify early postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Self-developed standardized questionnaires sent to the patients and referring urologists were used to collect data on late complications (>90) days. Stricture recurrence (SR) was defined as any postoperative endoscopic or open surgical intervention on the urethra. The influence of patient demographics, stricture characteristics, and operative procedure performed on the occurrence of SR was analyzed. Results: Early postoperative complications were rare events (11.3%) with only one severe CDC complication. Late complications were reported in 46.5% cases. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 3–114 months), however, 64 patients had no evidence of SR and required no further intervention, giving an overall success rate of 90.1%. Seven patients with SR had a higher body mass index, were older, and had been operated on by less experienced surgeon(s). Most SRs occurred within the first year after surgery. Conclusions: AAR was an effective and safe operative technique that allowed one-stage repair in our patients with anterior urethral strictures who needed resection of the scarred urethra and otherwise were not suitable for primary anastomosis or simple substitution urethroplasty.

Keywords:
One-stage repair, Bulbar urethral stricture, Augmented anastomosis, Anterior urethral stricture, Reconstructive surgery, Postoperative complications
1.
Andrich DE, Leach CJ, Mundy AR: The Barbagli procedure gives the best results for patch urethroplasty of the bulbar urethra. BJU Int 2001; 88: 385–389.
2.
Morey AF, Kizer WS: Proximal bulbar urethroplasty via extended anastomotic approach–what are the limits? J Urol 2006; 175: 2145–2149.
3.
Brandes SB: Decision making and surgical technique in urethroplasty; in Brandes SB, Morey AF (eds). Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery, ed 2. Humana Press, New York, 2014, p 1.
4.
Russell RH: The treatment of urethral stricture by excision. Br J Surg 1914; 2: 375–383.
5.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–213.
6.
Turner Warwick R: Principles of urethral reconstruction; in Webster G, Kirby R, King L, Goldwasser B (eds). Reconstructive Urology. Blackwell Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993, pp 609–612.
7.
Guralnick ML: The augmented anastomotic urethroplastiy; in Brandes SB, Morey AF (eds). Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery, ed 2. Humana Press, New York, 2014, p 203.
8.
Guralnick ML, Webster GD: The augmented anastomotic urethroplasty: indications and outcome in 29 patients. J Urol 2001; 165: 1496–1501.
9.
Abouassaly R, Angermeier KW: Augmented anastomotic urethroplasty. J Urol 2007; 177: 2211–2215.
10.
El-Kassaby AW, El-Zayat TM, Azazy S, Osman T: One-stage repair of long bulbar urethral strictures using augmented Russell Dorsal strip anastomosis: outcome of 234 cases. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 420–424.
11.
Elliott S, Metro M, McAninch J: Long-term followup of the ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol 2003; 169: 1754–1757.
12.
Barbagli G, Vallasciani S, Romano G, Fabbri F, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M: Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 33–41.
13.
Markiewicz MR, Lukose MA, Margarone JE 3rd, Barbagli G, Miller KS, Chuang SK: The oral mucosa graft: a systematic review. J Urol 2007; 178: 387–394.
14.
Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, Hacker A, Michel MS, Alken P: Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek? BJU Int 2005; 96: 619–623.
15.
Anema JG, Morey AF, McAninch JW, Mario LA, Wessells H: Complications related to the high lithotomy position during urethral reconstruction. J Urol 2000; 164: 360–363.
16.
Navai N, Erickson BA, Zhao LC, Okotie OT, Gonzalez CM: Complications following urethral reconstructive surgery: a six year experience. Int Braz J Urol 2008; 34: 594–600.
17.
Hoy NY, Kinnaird A, Rourke KF: Reconstructive urology expanded use of a dorsal onlay augmented anastomotic urethroplasty with buccal mucosa for long segment bulbar urethral strictures: analysis of outcomes and complications. Urology 2013; 81: 1357–1361.
18.
Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, et al: Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique? J Urol 2005; 174: 955–957.
19.
Barbagli G, Selli C, Tosto A, Palminteri E: Dorsal free graft urethroplasty. J Urol 1996; 155: 123–126.
20.
Coursey JW, Morey AF, McAninch JW, et al: Erectile function after anterior urethroplasty. J Urol 2001; 166: 2273–2276.
21.
Sharma V, Kumar S, Mandal AK, Singh SK: A study on sexual function of men with anterior urethral stricture before and after treatment. Urol Int 2011; 87: 341–345.
22.
Pfalzgraf D, Kluth L, Isbarn H, Reiss P, Riechardt S, Fisch M, et al: The Barbagli technique: 3-year experience with a modified approach. BJU Int 2013; 111:E132–E136.
23.
Blaschko SD, Sanford MT, Cinman NM, McAninch JW, Breyer BN: De novo erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2013 4; 112: 655–663.
24.
Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Meeks JJ, Cashy JP, Gonzalez CM: Prospective analysis of erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: incidence and recovery of function. J Urol 2010; 183: 657–661.
25.
Dogra PN, Saini AK, Seth A: Erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: a prospective analysis of incidence and probability of recovery – single-center experience. Urology 2011; 78: 78–81.
26.
Barbagli G, De Stefani S, Annino F, De Carne C, Bianchi G: Muscle- and nerve-sparing bulbar urethroplasty: a new technique. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 335–343.
27.
Mundy AR: Results and complications of urethroplasty and its future. BJU Int 1993; 71: 322–325.
28.
Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, -Marrocco G: Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom? BJU Int 2004; 94: 1188–1195.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.