Introduction: This study is aimed at assessing the use of various types of urinary catheters, appropriateness of catheter placement and factors associated with antibiotic use in a population of chronically catheterized patients in Istria County. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted between March and June 2017 in Istria County, Croatia, was initiated through a network of general family medicine offices. Data were collected from general practitioners (GPs) and from medical managers in nursing homes. Participants were asked to review medical records of their patients and to complete a 10-item questionnaire designed to retrieve information on patients with urinary catheter. Results: All GPs in the county were surveyed. We identified 309 patients with urinary catheter: 216 men (70%) and 93 women (30%). The overall prevalence of individuals with urinary catheters was 0.18%: 4.7% in nursing home population and 0.1% among non-institutionalized adult population. Most common indication for catheterization was chronic urinary retention (52%). One hundred eighty-six patients (60.4%) reported antibiotic usage in the previous 3 months for treating urinary infection. Conclusions: In Istria County, the prevalence of indwelling urinary catheters is highest in males, especially among patients in nursing homes. There is a need for focused education among GPs regarding urinary catheter maintenance and antibiotic prescription for suspected urinary tract infections.

Keywords:
Epidemiology, Prevalence, Urinary tract infection, Urinary catheters
1.
Mody L, Krein SL, Saint S, Min LC, Montoya A, Lansing B, et al: A targeted infection prevention intervention in nursing home residents with indwelling devices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 175: 714.
2.
Heudorf U, Gustav C, Mischler D, Schulze J: [Healthcare associated infections (HAI), antibiotic use and prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDRO) in residents of long-term care facilities: the Frankfurt HALT plus MDRO project 2012]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2014; 57: 414–422.
3.
Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, Anderson J, Moeschberger M: The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 291–301.
4.
Rogers MA, Mody L, Kaufman SR, Fries BE, McMahon LF Jr, Saint S: Use of urinary collection devices in skilled nursing facilities in five states. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 854–861.
5.
Tsan L, Langberg R, Davis C, Phillips Y, Pierce J, Hojlo C, et al: Nursing home-associated infections in Department of Veterans Affairs community living centers. Am J Infect Control 2010; 38: 461–466.
6.
Gardner A, Mitchell B, Beckingham W, Fasugba O: A point prevalence cross-sectional study of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections in six Australian hospitals. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e005099.
7.
Jansen IA, Hopmans TE, Wille JC, van den Broek PJ, van der Kooi TI, van Benthem BH: Appropriate use of indwelling urethra catheters in hospitalized patients: results of a multicentre prevalence study. BMC Urol 2012; 12: 25.
8.
Kuriyama A, Takada T, Irie H, Sakuraya M, Katayama K, Kawakami D, et al: Prevalence and appropriateness of urinary catheters in Japanese intensive care units: results from a multicenter point prevalence study. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 64:S127–S130.
9.
Warren JW: Catheter-associated bacteriuria in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15: 557–562.
10.
Rudman D, Hontanosas A, Cohen Z, Mattson DE: Clinical correlates of bacteremia in a Veterans Administration extended care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36: 726–732.
11.
Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC): Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31: 319–326.
12.
Shackley DC, Whytock C, Parry G, Clarke L, Vincent C, Harrison A, et al: Variation in the prevalence of urinary catheters: a profile of National Health Service patients in England. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013842.
13.
Census of Population. Household and Dwellings 2011. Croatian Bureau of Statistics. 2013. https://www.dzs.hr/Eng/censuses/census2011/results/censustabshtm.htm (cited August 14, 2017).
14.
Sundvall PD, Stuart B, Davis M, Roderick P, Moore M: Antibiotic use in the care home setting: a retrospective cohort study analysing routine data. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15: 71.
15.
Gage H, Avery M, Flannery C, Williams P, Fader M: Community prevalence of long-term urinary catheters use in England: community catheter prevalence England. Neurourol Urodyn 2017; 36: 293–296.
16.
Jain P, Parada JP, David A, Smith LG: Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1425–1429.
17.
Kidd EA, Stewart F, Kassis NC, Hom E, Omar MI: Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults; in The Cochrane Collaboration (ed): Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2015. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub3 (cited August 8, 2017).
18.
Hunter KF, Bharmal A, Moore KN: Long-term bladder drainage: suprapubic catheter versus other methods: a scoping review. Neurourol Urodyn 2013; 32: 944–951.
19.
Sheriff MK, Foley S, McFarlane J, Nauth-Misir R, Craggs M, Shah PJ: Long-term suprapubic catheterisation: clinical outcome and satisfaction survey. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 171–176.
20.
Ahluwalia R, Johal N, Kouriefs C, Kooiman G, Montgomery BS, Plail R: The surgical risk of suprapubic catheter insertion and long-term sequelae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 210–213.
21.
Cronin CG, Prakash P, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Arellano R, Guimares A, et al: Imaging-guided suprapubic bladder tube insertion: experience in the care of 549 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 182–188.
22.
Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, Agarwal R, Williams K, Brennan PJ: Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32: 101–114.
23.
Saint S, Lipsky BA: Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: should we? can we? how? Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 800.
24.
Warren JW: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997; 11: 609–622.
25.
Bonomo RA: Multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria in long-term-care facilities: an emerging problem in the practice of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 2000; 31: 1414–1422.
26.
Phillips CD, Adepoju O, Stone N, Moudouni DK, Nwaiwu O, Zhao H, et al: Asymptomatic bacteriuria, antibiotic use, and suspected urinary tract infections in four nursing homes. BMC Geriatr 2012; 12: 73.
27.
Jonsson K, E-Son Loft A-L, Nasic S, Hedelin H: A prospective registration of catheter life and catheter interventions in patients with long-term indwelling urinary catheters. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011; 45: 401–405.
28.
Nicolle LE: Catheter-related urinary tract infection. Drugs Aging 2005; 22: 627–639.
29.
Colgan R, Nicolle LE, McGlone A, Hooton TM: Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Am Fam Physician 2006; 74: 985–990.
30.
Bregenzer T, Frei R, Widmer AF, Seiler W, Probst W, Mattarelli G, et al: Low risk of bacteremia during catheter replacement in patients with long-term urinary catheters. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 521–525.
31.
Polastri F, Auckenthaler R, Loew F, Michel JP, Lew DP: Absence of significant bacteremia during urinary catheter manipulation in patients with chronic indwelling catheters. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38: 1203–1208.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.