Background: Complications of prostate cancer treatments have a substantial impact on the patient’s quality of life. We evaluated the prevalence of urinary consequences and factors affecting patient satisfaction and decisional regret after treatment. Methods: A retrospective self-administered questionnaire was sent to all members of the National Association of Prostate Cancer Patients in France. Results: From the 226 completed questionnaires received, the following information was obtained: 110 patients underwent surgery only, 29 received radiotherapy plus hormone therapy, 28 received radiotherapy only, and 49 received other combination treatments. The median follow-up period was 58.1 months. After treatment, the presence of urinary incontinence was reported by 34.5% of patients treated by radical prostatectomy, by 10.3% treated by radiotherapy plus hormone therapy, by 17.8% treated by curitherapy or radiotherapy only, and by 38.7% treated by other combination therapy (p = 0.01). The main reasons for decisional regret were the fact that patients received incomplete information about prostate cancer (40%) and consequences of treatment that affected the urinary system (34%). The information received about cancer was considered complete in 32.3% of the satisfied group and 14.3% of the decisional regret group (p = 0.003) and with regard to urinary incontinence the information received was considered complete in 41.4 and 17.4% respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Urinary consequences of prostate cancer treatment are common and impact the quality of life. Patients need clear information to be able to participate in therapeutic decision-making and to avoid subsequent decisional regret.

1.
Belot A, Grosclaude P, Bossard N, Jougla E, Benhamou E, Delafosse P, et al: Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1980–2005. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2008; 56: 159–175.
[PubMed]
2.
Hill C: [The frequency of cancer in France]. Rev Prat 2013; 63: 1106–1110.
[PubMed]
3.
Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW, Byrnes G, Antilla A, Ferlay J, et al: Recent trends in incidence of five common cancers in 26 European countries since 1988: analysis of the European cancer observatory. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51: 1164–1187.
[PubMed]
4.
Eggener SE, Mueller A, Berglund RK, Ayyathurai R, Solo-way C, Soloway MS, et al: A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2013; 189: 19–25.
[PubMed]
5.
Sathianathen NJ, McGuigan SM, Moon DA: Outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in the irradiated patient. BJU Int 2014; 113: 636–641.
[PubMed]
6.
Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderäng U, Thorsteinsdottir T, et al: Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol 2015; 68: 216–225.
[PubMed]
7.
Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B: Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the European and US experience. Rev Urol 2010; 12: 35–43.
[PubMed]
8.
Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Tong C: Information that affects patients’ treatment choices for early stage prostate cancer: a review. Can J Urol 2011; 18: 5998–6006.
[PubMed]
9.
Enel C, Matte A, Berchi C, Binquet C, Cormier L, Lejeune C: [Prostate cancer: how do patients choose their treatment?]. Bull Cancer 2013; 100: 191–199.
[PubMed]
10.
Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Li CL, Liu HE: Changes in decisional conflict and decisional regret in patients with localised prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs 2013; 23: 1959–1969.
[PubMed]
11.
Ratcliff CG, Cohen L, Pettaway CA, Parker PA: Treatment regret and quality of life following radical prostatectomy. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 3337–3343.
[PubMed]
12.
Aning JJ, Wassersug RJ, Goldenberg SL: Patient preference and the impact of decision-making aids on prostate cancer treatment choices and post-intervention regret. Curr Oncol Tor Ont 2012; 19(suppl 3):S37–S44.
[PubMed]
13.
Holmes JA, Bensen JT, Mohler JL, Song L, Mishel MH, Chen RC: Quality of care received and patient-reported regret in prostate cancer: analysis of a population-based prospective cohort. Cancer 2017; 123: 138–143.
[PubMed]
14.
Hurwitz LM, Cullen J, Elsamanoudi S, Kim DJ, Hudak J, Colston M, et al: A prospective cohort study of treatment decision-making for prostate cancer following participation in a multidisciplinary clinic. Urol Oncol 2016; 34: 233.e17–e25.
[PubMed]
15.
Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, Frosch D, Légaré F, Montori VM, et al: Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 2012; 344:e256.
[PubMed]
16.
Hacking B, Wallace L, Scott S, Kosmala-Anderson J, Belkora J, McNeill A: Testing the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of a ‘decision navigation’ intervention for early stage prostate cancer patients in Scotland – a randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology 2013; 22: 1017–1024.
[PubMed]
17.
Feldman-Stewart D, Tong C, Siemens R, Alibhai S, Pickles T, Robinson J, et al: The impact of explicit values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges after the decision is actually made: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Med Decis Making 2012; 32: 616–626.
[PubMed]
18.
Nan Tol-Geerdink JJ, Leer JW, Wijburg CJ, van Oort IM, Vergunst H, van Lin EJ, et al: Does a decision aid for prostate cancer affect different aspects of decisional regret, assessed with new regret scales? A randomized, controlled trial. Health Expect 2016; 19: 459–470.
[PubMed]
19.
Violette PD, Agoritsas T, Alexander P, Riikonen J, Santti H, Agarwal A, et al: Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 239–251.
[PubMed]
You do not currently have access to this content.