Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the possible predictive value of certain radiological and stone-related factors on the stone free (SF) rates following shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with upper ureteral calculi on a stone location-based manner. Methods: The success rates of SWL applications in a total of 190 patients (146 males, 44 females M/F: 3.32) presenting with ureteral stones were evaluated in detail. The impact of certain radiological and patient-related factors on the success rates particularly with an emphasis on the stone location was evaluated. Variables analyzed were the diameter of ureteric portion proximal to the stone, grade of hydronephrosis, stone size, stone density, and ureteral wall thickness at the impacted stone site. Success rates in terms of final SF status were evaluated after 4 weeks with non-contrast computer tomography (NCCT) examination. Results: All patients had a single ureteral stone. A total of 141 stones were located in the upper ureter and the remaining 49 stones were located in the middle ureter. While the mean age of the cases was 41.59 ± 11.66 years (range 17–72 years), mean stone size was 8.47 mm (4.1–23.7 mm). Following SWL, while a total of 108 (76.6%) patients with upper ureteric stones were completely SF at 4-week follow-up visit; this value was 25 (51.0%) in cases with middle ureteral stones. Although the diameter of the stone was in the same range with no meaningful difference, stone length and stone density were significantly higher in upper ureteral stones (p: 0.002 and p: 0.007, respectively). Proximal ureteral stones were found to be disintegrated in a more successful manner with higher SF rates compared to ureteral stones located in the mid portion of the ureter (p: 0.001). Conclusion: Prediction of the final outcome of SWL in patients with upper ureteral stones is a challenging issue and our data did clearly indicate a meaningful relationship between UWT and the success rates of SWL particularly in cases requiring additional procedures. Of all the evaluated stone and related factors, only UWT was found to be higher in proximal ureteral calculi at the stone site which could help us to predict the likelihood of stone disintegration in these parts of the involved ureter.

1.
Mugiya
S
,
Ito
T
,
Maruyama
S
,
Hadano
S
,
Nagae
H
.
Endoscopic features of impacted ureteral stones
.
J Urol
.
2004
;
171
(
1
):
89
91
.
2.
Deliveliotis
C
,
Chrisofos
M
,
Albanis
S
,
Serafetinides
E
,
Varkarakis
J
,
Protogerou
V
.
Management and follow-up of impacted ureteral stones
.
Urol Int
.
2003
;
70
(
4
):
269
72
.
3.
Yamashita
S
,
Inoue
T
,
Kohjimoto
Y
,
Hara
I
.
Comprehensive endoscopic management of impacted ureteral stones: literature review and expert opinions
.
Int J Urol
.
2022
;
29
(
8
):
799
806
.
4.
Binbay
M
,
Tepeler
A
,
Singh
A
,
Akman
T
,
Tekinaslan
E
,
Sarilar
O
, et al
.
Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones
.
Int Urol Nephrol
.
2011
;
43
(
4
):
989
95
.
5.
Wolf
JS
Jr
.
Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi
.
Urol Clin North Am
.
2007
;
34
(
3
):
421
30
.
6.
Wang
P
,
Zhan
Y
,
Li
J
,
Liu
G
,
Li
Z
,
Bai
S
.
Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic
.
World J Urol
.
2023
;
41
(
3
):
797
803
.
7.
Preminger
GM
,
Tiselius
HG
,
Assimos
DG
,
Alken
P
,
Buck
AC
,
Gallucci
M
, et al
.
2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi
.
Eur Urol
.
2007
;
52
(
6
):
1610
31
.
8.
Drake
T
,
Grivas
N
,
Dabestani
S
,
Knoll
T
,
Lam
T
,
Maclennan
S
, et al
.
What are the benefits and harms of ureteroscopy compared with shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones? A systematic review
.
Eur Urol
.
2017
;
72
(
5
):
772
86
.
9.
Skolarikos
A
,
Jung
H
,
Neisius
A
.
EAU guidelines on urolithiasis
.
Eur Urol
.
2023
.
10.
Ghoneim
IA
,
El-Ghoneimy
MN
,
El-Naggar
AE
,
Hammoud
KM
,
El-Gammal
MY
,
Morsi
AA
.
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques
.
Urology
.
2010
;
75
(
1
):
45
50
.
11.
Lopes Neto
AC
,
Korkes
F
,
Silva
JL
2nd
,
Amarante
RD
,
Mattos
MH
,
Tobias-Machado
M
, et al
.
Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy
.
J Urol
.
2012
;
187
:
164
8
.
12.
Wu
CF1
,
Shee
JJ
,
Lin
WY
,
Lin
CL
,
Chen
CS
.
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones
.
J Urol
.
2004
;
172
(
5 Pt 1
):
1899
902
.
13.
Dean
NS
,
Millan
B
,
Uy
M
,
Albers
P
,
Campbell
SM
,
Krambeck
AE
, et al
.
Ureteral wall thickness is an effective predictor of ureteral stone impaction and management outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Urol
.
2023
;
210
(
3
):
430
7
.
14.
Dasgupta
R
,
Cameron
S
,
Aucott
L
,
MacLennan
G
,
Thomas
RE
,
Kilonzo
MM
, et al
.
Shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic treatment as therapeutic interventions for stones of the ureter (TISU): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
.
Eur Urol
.
2021
;
80
(
1
):
46
54
.
15.
Yasar
H
,
Yildirim
S
,
Asik
A
,
Sahinler
EB
,
Simsek
G
,
Sahin
C
, et al
.
Does shock wave application affect the ureteral wall around an impacted stone? A critical evaluation focusing on ureteral wall thickness
.
J Clin Med
.
2025
;
14
(
21
):
7636
.
16.
Preminger
GM
,
Assimos
DG
,
Lingeman
JE
.
Chapter 44: ureteral calculi
. In:
Wein
AJ
,
Kavoussi
LR
,
Partin
AW
,
Peters
CA
, editors.
Campbell-Walsh urology
. (11th ed) .
Philadelphia, PA
:
Elsevier
;
2016
. p.
1223
87
.
17.
ElGanainy
E
,
Hameed
DA
,
Elgammal
MA
,
Abd-Elsayed
AA
,
Shalaby
M
.
Experience with impacted upper ureteral stones; should we abandon using semirigid ureteroscopes and pneumatic lithoclast
.
Int Arch Med
.
2009
;
2
(
1
):
13
.
18.
Sun
X
,
Xia
S
,
Lu
J
,
Liu
H
,
Han
B
,
Li
W
.
Treatment of large impactedproximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy
.
J Endourol
.
2008
;
22
(
5
):
913
7
.
19.
Juan
YS
,
Shen
JT
,
Li
CC
,
Wang
CJ
,
Chuang
SM
,
Huang
CH
, et al
.
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones
.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci
.
2008
;
24
(
4
):
204
9
.
20.
Manohar
T
,
Ganpule
A
,
Desai
M
.
Comparative evaluation of Swiss litho clast 2 and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted upper-ureteral stones
.
J Endourol
.
2008
;
22
(
3
):
443
6
.
21.
Mugiya
S
,
Ozono
S
,
Nagata
M
,
Takayama
T
,
Nagae
H
.
Retrograde endoscopic management of ureteral stones more than 2 cm in size
.
Urology
.
2006
;
67
(
6
):
1164
8
.
22.
Kallidonis
P
,
Ntasiotis
P
,
Knoll
T
,
Sarica
K
,
Papatsoris
A
,
Somani
BK
, et al
.
Minimally invasive surgical ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large ureteric stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2017
;
3
(
6
):
554
66
.
23.
Karlsen
SJ
,
Renkel
J
,
Tahir
AR
,
Angelsen
A
,
Diep
LM
.
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for 5- to 10-mm stones in the proximal ureter: prospective effectiveness patient-preference trial
.
J Endourol
.
2007
;
21
(
1
):
28
33
.
24.
Ziaee
SA
,
Halimiasl
P
,
Aminsharifi
A
,
Shafi
H
,
Beigi
FM
,
Basiri
A
.
Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
.
Urology
.
2008
;
71
(
1
):
28
31
.
25.
Singh
I
,
Gupta
NP
,
Hemal
AK
,
Aron
M
,
Dogra
PN
,
Seth
A
.
Efficacy and outcome of surgical intervention in patients with nephrolithiasis and chronic renal failure
.
Int Urol Nephrol
.
2001
;
33
(
2
):
293
8
.
26.
Geraghty
RM
,
Jones
P
,
Herrmann
TRW
,
Aboumarzouk
O
,
Somani
BK
.
Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
.
World J Urol
.
2018
;
36
(
11
):
1783
93
.
27.
Lee
YH
,
Tsai
JY
,
Jiaan
BP
,
Wu
T
,
Yu
CC
.
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones
.
Urology
.
2006
;
67
(
3
):
480
4
.
28.
Yu
W
,
Cheng
F
,
Zhang
X
,
Yang
S
,
Ruan
Y
,
Xia
Y
, et al
.
Retrogradeureteroscopic treatment for upper ureteral stones: a 5-year retrospective study
.
J Endourol
.
2010
;
24
(
11
):
1753
7
.
29.
Fong
YK
,
Ho
SH
,
Peh
OH
,
Ng
FC
,
Lim
PH
,
Quek
PL
, et al
.
Extracorporea shockwave lithotripsy and intracorporeal lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi-a comparative assessment of efficacy and safety
.
Ann Acad Med Singap
.
2004
;
33
(
1
):
80
3
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Digital Version

Pay-Per-View Access
$45.00
1 Karger Article Bundle Token
$170
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal