Objective: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of renal calculi >2 cm. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database about RIRS and PCNL for the treatment of renal stones. The retrieval time ended in December 2013. All clinical trials were retrieved and their included references investigated. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of all included studies, and the eligible studies were included and analyzed using the RevMan 5.2 software. Results: Two randomized controlled trials and six clinical controlled trials were included, involving a total of 590 patients. Our meta-analysis showed that there were not significant differences in stone-free rate (relative risk [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.02, p = 0.11) and fever (RR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.67, p = 0.85) between RIRS and PCNL. We found that hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -2.10, 95% CI -3.08 to -1.11, p < 0.10) and bleeding (RR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.68, p = 0.01) were lower and operation time was longer (WMD = 19.11, 95% CI 7.83-30.39, p < 0.10) for RIRS. Conclusion: RIRS is a safe and effective procedure. It can successfully treat patients with stones >2 cm with a high stone-free rate and significantly reduce hospital stay without increasing complications. RIRS can be used as an alternative treatment to PCNL in selected cases with larger renal stones. However, further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords:
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Retrograde intrarenal surgery, Meta-analysis
1.
Fernström I, Johannson B: Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976;10:257-259.
2.
Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000.
3.
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project: Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 2012;62:160-165.
4.
Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D'A Honey RJ, Pace KT: A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent? J Endourol 2011;25:481-485.
5.
Al-Qahtani SM, Gil-Deiz-de-Medina S, Traxer O: Predictors of clinical outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser for renal stone greater than 2 cm. Adv Urol 2012;2012:543537.
6.
Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T: Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol 2012;19:264-267.
7.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12.
8.
Liu J: Systematic review of nonrandomized controlled trials. Chin J Evid Based Med 2001;1:239-243.
9.
Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, et al: RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis 2013;41:73-78.
10.
Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, et al: A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol 2012;26:52-57.
11.
Hyams ES, Shah O: Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis. J Urol 2009;182:1012-1017.
12.
Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al: Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 2012;109:1384-1389.
13.
Yang SX, Song C, Liu QL, et al: Management of renal calculi: retrograde ureteroscopic holmium laser versus percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Chin J Urol 2013;34:666-669.
14.
Zhu YS, Su HW, Deng QF: Comparative efficacy analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal calyceal stones. J Luzhou Med Coll 2013;4:382-383.
15.
Xiao KB, Liu XL, Zang YC, et al: Comparative efficacy analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treatment of kidney stones. Jiangsu Med J 2013;11:1136-1137.
16.
Cao SY, Xiong J, Zhou XJ, et al: Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscope for the management of 2- 4 cm renal stones. Int J Urol Nephrol 2013;1:34-36.
17.
Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, et al: Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int 2003;63:1817-1823.
18.
Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG: Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 2010;12:e86-e96.
19.
Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Seitz C: Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology, 2013. Available at http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/21_Urolithiasis_LR.pdf.
20.
Mugiya S: Guidelines on urolithiasis: update of diagnosis and treatment. Hinyokika Kiyo 2012;58:703-706.
21.
De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5,803 patients. J Endourol 2011;25:11-17.
22.
Kerbl K, Rehman J, Landman J, Lee D, Sundaram C, Clayman RV: Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress? J Endourol 2002;16:281-288.
23.
Marshall VF: Fiber optics in urology. J Urol 1964;91:110-114.
24.
Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Katzenwadel A, et al: Retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of nephrolithiasis: is a 100% stone-free rate achievable? J Endourol 2012;26:489-493.
25.
Ho CC, Hee TG, Hong GE, et al: Outcomes and safety of retrograde intra-renal surgery for renal stones less than 2 cm in size. Nephrourol Mon 2012;4:454-457.
26.
Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M: Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int 2012;110:E346-E349.
27.
Estrade V, Bensalah K, Bringer JP, et al: Place of the flexible ureterorenoscopy first choice for the treatment of kidney stones. Survey results practice committee of the AFU lithiasis completed in 2011. Prog Urol 2013;23:22-28.
28.
Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D: Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi. J Urol 1998;160:346-351.
29.
El-Anany FG, Hammouda HM, Maghraby HA, Elakkad MA: Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal calculi. BJU Int 2001;88:850-853.
30.
Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - is this the new frontier? J Urol 2008;179:981-984.
31.
Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S: Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 2009;23:1395-1398.
32.
Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG: Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 2009;55:1190-1196.
33.
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, et al: Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm. Urol Res 2010;38:397-402.
34.
Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O: Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2-3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 2010;24:1583-1588.
35.
Hussain M, Acher P, Penev B, Cynk M: Redefining the limits of flexible ureterorenoscopy. J Endourol 2011;25:45-49.
36.
Mariani AJ: Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol 2007;177:168-173.
37.
Xu G, Li X, He Y, He Z: Staged single-tract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of staghorn stone in patients with solitary kidney. Urol Res 2012;40:745-749.
38.
Gücük A, Kemahlı E, Üyetürk U, Tuygun C, Yıldız M, Metin A: Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 2013;190:144-148.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.