Objective: We evaluated reconstructive and oncological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) combined with mini-laparoscopic instruments as standard equipment. Patients and Methods: 30 patients underwent reconstructive and oncological LESS: mini-laparoscopic-assisted LESS pyeloplasty (LESS-P, n = 18), mini-laparoscopic-assisted LESS partial nephrectomy (LESS-PN, n = 7) or mini-laparoscopic-assisted LESS radical prostatectomy (LESS-RP, n = 5). Perioperative data were prospectively collected. Results: The 18 LESS-P cases had operative times ranging between 120 and 180 min (average 147.9 min). Estimated blood loss ranged between 100 and 300 ml (average 202.1 ml). Two patients required additional management for failed reconstruction. LESS-PN was performed in 7 patients with tumor size ranging between 2.5 and 3.8 cm (average 2.7 cm). Average operative time and blood loss were 155 (140-180) min and 321.4 (250-550) ml, respectively. Renal artery clamping took place in 1 case. LESS-RP was performed in 5 patients; average operative time was 156 (140-180) min and average blood loss 196 (100-400) ml. Functional and oncological outcome was directly comparable to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Conclusion: The combination of LESS and mini-laparoscopic instrumentation as routine equipment of reconstructive LESS reveals a different perspective for ‘scarless' urologic surgery.

1.
Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, et al: Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2011;59:26-45.
2.
Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, et al: Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 2008;54:1020-1029.
3.
Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Hellawell G, et al: Technique of laparoscopic-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:644-650.
4.
White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al: Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 2009;74:801-804.
5.
Liatsikos E, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Do M, Dietel A, Stolzenburg JU: Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques? World J Urol 2012;30:581-587.
6.
Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Ragavan N, Dietel A, Do M, Thi PH, Till H, Liatsikos EN: Clinical outcomes of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. World J Urol 2012;30:589-596.
7.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.
8.
Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Minh D, Dietel A, Häfner T, Dimitriou D, Al-Aown A, Kyriazis I, Liatsikos EN: Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2,400 cases. J Endourol 2009;23:1467-1472.
9.
Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Abrams P, et al: Scoring the short form ICSmaleSF questionnaire. International Continence Society. J Urol 2000;164:1948-1955.
10.
Rosen RC, Althof SE, Giuliano F: Research instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile function. Urology 2006;68(suppl 3A):6-16.
11.
Rosen RC: Measurement of male and female sexual dysfunction. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2001;3:182-187.
12.
White MA, Haber GP, Kaouk JH: Robotic single-site surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20:86-91.
13.
Sanchez-Salas RE, Barret E, Watson J, Stakhovskyi O, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Rane A, Desai MM, Sotelo R, Vallancien G: Current status of natural orifice trans-endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) in urologic surgery. Int Braz J Urol 2010;36:385-400.
14.
Clements T, Raman JD: Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Ther Adv Urol 2011;3:141-149.
15.
Barret E, Sanchez-Salas R, Ercolani MC, Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau X: Natural orifice transendoluminal surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the future of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Future Oncol 2011;7:427-434.
16.
Humphrey JE, Canes D: Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology. Int J Urol 2012;19:416-428.
17.
Dasgupta P: Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique. BJU Int 2011;107:816.
18.
Tugcu V, Sonmezay E, Ilbey YO, Polat H, Tasci AI: Transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: initial experiences. J Endourol 2010;24:2023-2027.
19.
Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA: Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 2009;74:1029-1034.
20.
Stein RJ, Berger AK, Brandina R, et al: Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique. BJU Int 2011;107:811-815.
21.
Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, Aron M, Irwin BH, Canes D, Desai MR, Rao PP, Sotelo R, Stein R, Gill IS: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology 2009;74:805-812.
22.
Ju SH, Lee DG, Lee JH, Baek MK, Jeong BC, Jeon SS, Lee KS, Han DH: Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty using additional 2 mm instruments: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Korean J Urol 2011;52:616-621.
23.
Best SL, Donnally C, Mir SA, Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA: Complications during the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2011;108:1326-1329.
24.
Irwin BH, Rao PP, Stein RJ, Desai MM: Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in urology. Urol Clin North Am 2009;36:223-235.
25.
Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Gurbuz C, Cadeddu JA, Best SL: Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Eur Urol 2012;61:410-414.
26.
Kaouk JH, Goel RK: Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009;55:1163-1170.
27.
Stein RJ, White MA, Goel RK, Irwin BH, Haber GP, Kaouk JH: Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using GelPort as the access platform. Eur Urol 2010;57:132-137.
28.
Gaboardi F, Gregori A, Santoro L, et al: ‘LESS' radical prostatectomy: a pilot feasibility study with a personal original technique. BJU Int 2011;107:460-464.
29.
Fiori C, Morra I, Bertolo R, Mele F, Chiarissi ML, Porpiglia F: Standard vs. mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty: perioperative outcomes and cosmetic results. BJU Int 2013;111:E121-E126.
30.
Heuer R, Gill IS, Guazzoni G, et al: A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:223-232.
31.
Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg JU, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Tewari A, Cadeddu JA: Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2013;63:266-280.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.