Objective: We compared the results of holmium laser and pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy for large ureteric calculi in terms of efficacy, safety and complications. Methods: The study was conducted between April 2009 and October 2010. 80 patients divided into two equally matched groups were included in a prospective randomized trial including patients with a ureteric stone size of 0.5–2 cm. A holmium laser with a 550-µm fiber was employed in the laser lithotripsy (LL) group. The Swiss Lithoclast was used in the pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) group. Results: Mean stone size was comparable in both groups, namely 13.1 mm in the PL group and 12.9 mm in the LL group. The early stone-free rate was equal in both groups, while the delayed stone-free rate was 95% in LL and 85% in PL. Stone migration occurred in 12 PL cases and in 5 LL cases. Ureteric perforation occurred in 3 LL cases and in 2 PL cases. Ureteric stricture occurred in 1 case following LL. Conclusion: Both PL and LL are effective and safe modalities in treating large ureteric stones with minor insignificant differences. A pneumatic system may be more efficient with regard to the cost-benefit ratio, which was not studied in the present work; further studies should address this issue.

Keywords:
Ureter, Ureteroscopy, Lithotripsy, Stones, Laser, Pneumatic lithotripsy
1.
Denstedt J, Razvi H, Rowe E, Grignon D, Eberwein P: Investigation of tissue effects of a new device for intracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the Swiss Lithoclast. J Urol 1995;153:535–537.
2.
Vassar G, Chan K, Teichman J, Glickman R, Weintraub S, Pfefer T, et al: Holmium:YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism. J Endourol 1999;13:181–190.
3.
Teichman J, Vassar G, Glickman R: Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet lithotripsy efficiency varies with stone composition. Urology 1998;52:392–397.
4.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.
5.
Tansu N, Obek C, Onal B, Yalçin V, Oner A, Solok V: A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar. Eur Urol 2004;45:352–355.
6.
Denstedt J, Eberwein P, Singh R: The Swiss Lithoclast: a new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol 1992;148:1088–1090.
7.
Hoskings DH, Smith WE, McColm SE: A comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy under intravenous sedation for the management of distal ureteric calculi. Can J Urol 2003;10:1780–1784.
8.
Arrabal-Polo MA, Arrabal-Martin M, Mijan-Ortiz JL, Valle-Diaz F, Lopez-Leon V, Merino-Salas S, et al: Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy vs. extracorporeal lithotripsy. BJU Int 2009;104:1144–1147.
9.
Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, De Stefani S, Pini GA, Rivalta M, Cianci F, Bianchi G: How effective is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones with Dornier Lithotripter S EMSE 220F-XXP? A prospective and preliminary assessment. Surg Endosc 2011;25:943–946.
10.
Lee J, Jonat L, Qiu J, Chew B, Chan K, Milner T, et al: Holmium:YAG lithotripsy: effect of power settings and anti-retropulsion devices. J Urol 2011;185(suppl 4):4S.
11.
Nutahara K, Kato M, Miyata A, Murata A, Okegawa T, Miura I, et al: Comparative study of pulsed dye laser and pneumatic lithotripters for transurethral ureterolithotripsy. Int J Urol 2000;7:172–175.
12.
Jeon S, Hyun J, Lee K: A comparison of holmium:YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation. Int J Urol 2005;12:544–547.
13.
Tipu SA, Malik HA, Mohhayuddin N, Sultan G, Hussain M, Hashmi A, et al: Treatment of ureteric calculi – use of holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy versus pneumatic Lithoclast. J Pak Med Assoc 2007;57:440–443.
14.
Garg S, Mandal A, Singh S, Naveen A, Ravimohan M, Aggarwal M, et al: Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus ballistic lithotripsy for treatment of ureteric stones: a prospective comparative study. Urol Int 2009;82:341–345.
15.
Bapat SS, Pai KV, Purnapatre SS, Yadav PB, Padye AS: Comparison of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in managing upper ureteral stones. J Endourol 2007;21:1425–1427.
16.
Shao Y, Zhuo J, Sun XW, Wen W, Liu HT, Xia SJ: Non-stented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. Urol Res 2008;36:259–263.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.