Introduction: Nutritional support has been demonstrated to improve recovery from radical cystectomy, but is expensive and when used inappropriately may actually increase the costs and morbidity of surgery. We sought to establish national patterns of practice with regard to feeding following cystectomy in the UK. Aims and Methods: Following consultation with the specialist nutrition team, a questionnaire was designed to investigate the feeding strategy after cystectomy and dispatched by post to all UK urologists. Results: The majority (60%) of respondents employed a traditional strategy of resting the bowel and feeding orally after bowel recovery. A minority used either early total parenteral nutrition (TPN; 18.5%) or enteral nutrition (6.5%), but a larger proportion (29%) felt enteral nutrition was the ‘optimal’ feeding regime. Only 30% used guidelines and 52% felt trials would help to establish a nutrition strategy following cystectomy. Conclusion: There is little evidence that TPN improves the outcome of cystectomy and it may actually increase morbidity and costs, whereas enteral nutrition may improve recovery. Despite this evidence TPN is widely used by urologists whereas enteral nutrition is used infrequently. Implementation of an evidence-based feeding regime after cystectomy is likely to reduce the morbidity and financial costs of cystectomy.

Keywords:
Radical cystectomy, recovery, Enteral nutrition, Total parenteral nutrition
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.