Introduction: A gastric segment used to increase bladder capacity can undergo considerable changes over time, as can all intestinal segments implanted in the urinary tract and in contact with urine. This experimental study reports the differences between the histological alterations observed in the gastric patch transposed in the bladder both with its own pedicle and after deafferentation from the stomach. Materials and Methods: A group of 30 young male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent gastrocystoplasty. Survivors were divided into 3 groups: gastrocystoplasty alone (8 rats); gastrocystoplasty with vascular deafferentation at 15 days (7 rats), and at 2 months (8 rats). 5 rats were used as controls. Urinary pH was evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Results: Histology showed that early devascularization hindered the fusion of the two mucosae in the junctional area but reduced papillary hyperplasia (p = 0.013) of the gastric mucosa. No changes were observed in urinary pH after patch devascularization. Conclusions: Vascular deafferentation creates a gastric flap on the bladder which, even if it does not prevent urinary acidification, reduces the frequency of histologically detected changes susceptible for transformation into neoplasms.

Keywords:
Bladder, Gastrocystoplasty, Rats, Microsurgery
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.