Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the indications, accuracy, complications and impact of image-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Materials and Methods: Between 1994 and 1999, percutaneous biopsies under ultrasonography or computerized tomography guidance were performed in 33 patients with renal mass (22 men and 11 women, mean age 57.5 years, range 21–88). We retrospectively analyzed the relationship between clinical and histopathological findings, and discuss the appropriateness of the indications for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in the diagnosis of renal masses. Results: The indications used in our institution were as follows: (1) clinical and radiological findings to suggest a diagnosis other than primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n = 15); (2) suspicious lesions of RCC in multiple cystic renal masses (n = 7); (3) differentiation of transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis from RCC (n = 7); (4) differentiation of angiomyolipoma from RCC (n = 4). Sufficient amounts of tissues were obtained from all patients for pathological diagnosis. Among 33 patients, 21 (63.6%) were diagnosed positive for malignancy, and 15 underwent surgical intervention. The histopathological findings between percutaneous biopsy and surgically resected tissue were identical in 13 cases (86.7%). No patient developed major complications requiring surgical treatment. Conclusion: If performed under appropriate selection of patients, percutaneous image-guided biopsy is a safe, reliable and accurate method of managing suspicious and/or indeterminate renal mass, and may contribute to the selection of appropriate clinical management by avoiding unnecessary procedures.

Keywords:
Renal mass, Biopsy, Image guidance, Indication
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.