Purpose: This article describes our experience of using a totally extraperitoneal approach for endoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and inguinal hernia repair with the mesh technique in one procedure. Materials and Methods: A total of 52 patients underwent modified pelvic lymph node dissection for the staging of prostate cancer. Eight of them had hernia defects; 1 was recurrent. Five patients with direct and 3 patients with indirect inguinal hernias were treated by totally extraperitoneal hernia repair with the placement of a mesh measuring at least 10 × 15 cm (prolene mesh with incision and flap). Results: The mean duration of the lymphadenectomy itself was decreased from 150 min (first 20 patients) to 70 min (n = 21–52). The mean additional procedure time for hernioplasty was 15 min. The overall lymph node-positive rate was 9.6%. The complication rate was 7.7%. Four patients developed symptomatic lymphoceles, 1 of whom developed deep venous thrombosis. No complications occurred which were attributed to hernia repair. Morbidity did not rise, and hospitalization time did not increase for the patients who underwent hernioplasty. There were no recurrences or neuralgias on follow-up up to 2 years. Conclusions: By avoiding entry into the peritoneal cavity, the extraperitoneal approach obviates intra-abdominal complications (ileus, bowel injury, peritonitis) in both techniques. The extraperitoneal approach for pelvic lymph node dissection allows concomitant inguinal hernia to be repaired with low morbidity and within an acceptable operating time.

Keywords:
Extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection, Endoscopy, Hernioplasty, Lymphadenectomy, Prostate cancer
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.