There have been many reports describing the complications of retained ureteral stents following stone treatment. We wanted to evaluate the practicality of definitive treatment of poorly compliant patients who present with ureteral stones using a straight stent connected to a urethral catheter alone and compared these to patients treated with double-J stents alone. We treated 23 patients (12 in group I and 11 patients in group II) who had a ureteral stone of 6 mm or less, with an indwelling straight stent and a double-J stent, respectively, while on oral antibiotics. We followed these patients 1 week later with an abdominal X-ray prior to removing the stent. Eleven patients in group I and 9 patients in group II passed their stones spontaneously. Three patients required surgical intervention with a ureterscope and laser lithotripsy. There were no cases of infection or pyelonephritis. Although each of the straight-stent-treated patients returned to our clinic for follow-up, only 5 of the 11 double-J stent patients returned for follow-up. The remaining 6 patients had to be contacted to remind them that they still had an internal stent. Although technologic advances now allow many urologists to definitively treat ureteral stones, some urologists may lack the proper equipment and/or assistance to treat the stone at the time of presentation, or may deal with non-compliant patients. Therefore, in these certain circumstances, treatment of small ureteral stones in non-compliant patients using a straight stent connected to a leg bag, as either definitive or initial treatment, may be of practical use and avoid the risk of retained double-J ureteral stents.

Keywords:
Ureter, Stones, Stent, Non-compliance
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.