In a clinical study the ultrasonic determination of the residual bladder volume is evaluated by applying several echographic methods described in the literature. 163 patients (age 3–89 years, 114 males and 49 females) and 13 students were examined. Only in the latter group the bladder volume was also determined by a planimetric method. The most practical method showed a good agreement (with a maximum deviation of 25%) between the ultrasonically measured volumes and the volumes measured by catheterization in 66% of the cases. This method makes use of the formula Vus = 0.5(Vt + V1), where Vus = residual volume estimated by ultrasonography; Vt = volume measured by the computer using the largest transversal ultrasonic bladder section, and V1 = volume measured for the largest longitudinal section). Factors that influence image quality and accuracy because of changes in the form of the bladder were analyzed. The magnitude of the residual volume determined the image quality and the accuracy above all: lower volumes give worse images and are less accurate. Other factors seem to be relatively unimportant. To avoid discomfort, caused by urine tract infection and urethral strictures, ultrasonic determination of the residual urine is recommended for clinical application.

Keywords:
Ultrasonic determination, Residual bladder volume
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel
1989
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.