Background: Today, medical expulsive therapy (MET) is more effective and commonly used in distal ureteral stones when compared with conservative treatments. Many treatments, namely, alpha-adrenergic blockers and calcium channel blockers, prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, glyceryl trinitrate, and steroids, have been, therefore, utilized to mitigate such complications and accelerate stone expulsion. Several animal and human studies revealed the presence of β3-receptors in the ureter and bladder, where stimulating these receptors could relax the distal ureteral segment. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of use of mirabegron as MET for distal ureteral stones (intramural and extramural). Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled study including 90 patients who had distal ureteral stones less than 10 mm and were evaluated between January and June 2020. The patients were classified into 3 groups: group (A) 30 patients: mirabegron 50 mg d−1 + diclofenac Na 100 mg tab (to be taken only during colic episodes), group (B) 30 patients: tamsulosin HCL 0.4 mg cap + diclofenac Na 100 mg tab (to be taken only during colic episodes), and group (C) 30 patients: diclofenac Na 100 mg tab only (to be taken only during colic episodes). Age, sex, stone size, laterality, and grade of ureterohydronephrosis were recorded. Patients were observed for 30 days, and ureteroscopy was completed for those with nonexpulsed stones. Follow-up parameters included number of renal colic episodes, duration of medical therapy, stone expulsion time, and stone expulsion rate (SER). Results: In the group (A), 2 (6.6%) patients were excluded due to nasal congestion, and 1 (3.3%) patient was excluded due to a 20-mm Hg systolic blood pressure increase. Four (13.3%) patients in group (B) were noncompliant on medical treatment. In addition, 2 (6.6%) patients in group (A), 1 (3.3%) patient in group (B), and 5 (16.6%) patients in group (C) who did not attend follow-up examinations were excluded from the study. The SER increased significantly in group (A) and (B) when compared with group (C). The mean time of stone expulsion was about 15, 25, and 12 days for groups A, B, and C, respectively, and there was a significant statistical difference (p value = 0.006) among the 3 groups. The mean number of renal colic episodes of group (A) of patients was 1.8 times, while that of group (B) was 2.6 times and that of group (C) was 2.16 times with no significant statistical difference after comparing the 3 groups (p value = 0.660). Conclusions: Treatment with mirabegron appears to be a safe and effective medical expulsion therapy for distal ureteric stones and is better than tamsulosin.

1.
Ramello
A
,
Vitale
C
,
Marangella
J
.
Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis
.
J Nephrol
.
2001
;
13
:
45
50
.
2.
Erturhan
S
,
Erbagci
A
,
Yagci
F
,
Celik
M
,
Solakhan
M
,
Sarica
K
.
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of use of tamsulosin and/or tolterodine for medical treatment of distal ureteral stones
.
Urology
.
2007
;
69
(
4
):
633
6
. .
3.
Preminger
G
,
Tiselius
H
,
Assimos
D
,
Alken
P
,
Buck
C
,
Gallucci
M
,
2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi
.
J Urol
.
2007
;
178
:
2418
34
.
4.
Dellabella
M
,
Milanese
G
,
Muzzonigro
G
.
Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxtavesical ureteral stones
.
J Urol
.
2003
;
170
:
2202
5
. .
5.
Segura
JW
,
Preminger
GM
,
Assimos
D
,
Dretler
S
,
Kahn
R
,
Lingeman
J
,
Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi
.
J Urol
.
1997
;
158
:
1915
21
.
6.
De Coninck
V
,
Antonelli
J
,
Chew
B
,
Patterson
JM
,
Skolarikos
A
,
Bultitude
M
.
Medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones: future trends and knowledge gaps
.
Eur Urol
.
2019 Nov
;
76
(
5
):
658
66
. .
7.
Hollingsworth
JM
,
Rogers
MA
,
Kaufman
SR
,
Bradford
TJ
,
Saint
S
,
Wei
JT
,
Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis
.
Lancet
.
2006
;
368
:
1171
9
. .
8.
Beach
MA
,
Mauro
LS
.
Pharmacologic expulsive treatment of ureteral calculi
.
Ann Pharmacother
.
2006
;
40
:
1361
8
. .
9.
Solakhan
M
,
Bayrak
O
,
Bulut
E
.
Efficacy of mirabegron in medical expulsive therapy
.
Heidelberg, Germany
:
Springer-Verlag GmbH
;
2018
.
10.
Matsumoto
R
,
Otsuka
A
,
Suzuki
T
,
Shinbo
H
,
Mizuno
T
,
Kurita
Y
,
Expression and functional role of β3 -adrenoceptors in the human ureter
.
Int J Urol
.
2013
;
20
:
1007
14
. .
11.
Parks
JH
,
Coward
M
,
Coe
FL
.
Correspondence between stone composition and urine supersaturation in nephrolithiasis
.
Kidney Int
.
1997
;
51
:
894
900
. .
12.
Singh
A
,
Alter
HJ
,
Littlepage
A
.
A systematic review of medical therapy to facilitate passage of ureteral calculi
.
Ann Emerg Med
.
2007
;
50
:
552
63
. .
13.
Dell’Atti
L
.
Silodosin versus tamsulosin as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a prospective randomized study
.
Urologia
.
2015
;
82
:
54
7
. .
14.
Seitz
C
,
Liatsikos
E
,
Porpiglia
F
,
Tiselius
HG
,
Zwergel
U
.
Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence?
Eur Urol
.
2009
;
56
:
455
71
. .
15.
Campschroer
T
,
Zhu
Y
,
Duijvesz
D
,
Grobbee
DE
,
Lock
MT
.
Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones
.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
.
2014
;
4
:
CD008509
. .
16.
Furyk
J
,
Chu
K
,
Banks
C
,
Greenslade
J
,
Keijzers
G
,
Thom
O
,
Distal ureteric stones and tamsulosin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial
.
Ann Emerg Med
.
2016
;
67
:
86
95
.
17.
Pickard
R
,
Starr
K
,
MacLennan
G
,
Lam
T
,
Thomas
R
,
Burr
J
,
Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial
.
Lancet
.
2015
;
386
:
341
9
.
18.
Sur
R
,
Shore
N
,
L’Esperance
J
,
Knudsen
B
,
Gupta
M
,
Olsen
S
,
Silodosin to facilitate passage of ureteral stones: a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
.
Eur Urol
.
2015
;
67
:
959
64
.
19.
Bayar
G
,
Yavuz
A
,
Cakmak
S
,
Ofluoglu
Y
,
Kilinc
MF
,
Kucuk
E
,
Efficacy of silodosin or mirabegron in medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized-controlled study
.
Int Urol Nephrol
.
2020
;
52
:
835
40
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.