Introduction: The Prostate Cancer gene 3 (PCA3) urine test has gained importance in the diagnostic workup of prostate cancer (PC). Limited evidence suggests that PCA3 is not altered in the presence of inflammation. Objective: To assess the impact of histological inflammation on PCA3. Methods: PCA3 was evaluated in patients prior to prostate biopsy (n = 193) and to radical prostatectomy (n = 197). In patients without PC, inflammation was assessed and quantified by individual scores integrating grade and extent. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of inflammation grade on PCA3. Results: The PCA3 scores prior to prostatectomy were lower (median 45) than those before positive biopsy (57; p = 0.008). Of 101 negative biopsies, 78% showed inflammation. The median PCA3 scores in the groups with no inflammation and with maximum grade 1 (n = 22), 2 (n = 38), and 3 (n = 19) inflammation were 45, 38, 27, and 25 (p = 0.016). The multivariate models revealed a decrease in PCA3 proportional to the grade and extent of inflammation (p < 0.04 each). Conclusions: The present data imply that the PCA3 score decreases in the presence of inflammation, which is relevant, for instance, to testing after a recently performed biopsy. In general, inflammation should be regarded as a factor putatively influencing PCA3 and other available and upcoming PC tests.

1.
de la Taille
A
.
Progensa PCA3 test for prostate cancer detection
.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn
.
2007
Sep
;
7
(
5
):
491
7
.
[PubMed]
1473-7159
2.
Groskopf
J
,
Aubin
SM
,
Deras
IL
,
Blase
A
,
Bodrug
S
,
Clark
C
, et al.
APTIMA PCA3 molecular urine test: development of a method to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
.
Clin Chem
.
2006
Jun
;
52
(
6
):
1089
95
.
[PubMed]
0009-9147
3.
Albino
G
,
Capoluongo
E
,
Rocchetti
S
,
Palumbo
S
,
Zuppi
C
,
Cirillo-Marucco
E
.
Evaluation of the diagnostic and predictive power of PCA3 in the prostate cancer. A different best cut-off in each different scenario. Preliminary results
.
Arch Ital Urol Androl
.
2014
Dec
;
86
(
4
):
306
10
.
[PubMed]
1124-3562
4.
Klatte
T
,
Waldert
M
,
de Martino
M
,
Schatzl
G
,
Mannhalter
C
,
Remzi
M
.
Age-specific PCA3 score reference values for diagnosis of prostate cancer
.
World J Urol
.
2012
Jun
;
30
(
3
):
405
10
.
[PubMed]
0724-4983
5.
Gui-Zhong
L
,
Libo
M
,
Guanglin
H
,
Jianwei
W
.
The correlation of extent and grade of inflammation with serum PSA levels in patients with IV prostatitis
.
Int Urol Nephrol
.
2011
Jun
;
43
(
2
):
295
301
.
[PubMed]
0301-1623
6.
Vlaeminck-Guillem
V
,
Bandel
M
,
Cottancin
M
,
Rodriguez-Lafrasse
C
,
Bohbot
JM
,
Sednaoui
P
.
Chronic prostatitis does not influence urinary PCA3 score
.
Prostate
.
2012
Apr
;
72
(
5
):
549
54
.
[PubMed]
0270-4137
7.
De Luca
S
,
Passera
R
,
Milillo
A
,
Coda
R
,
Randone
DF
.
Histological chronic prostatitis and high-grade prostate intra-epithelial neoplasia do not influence urinary prostate cancer gene 3 score
.
BJU Int
.
2012
Dec
;
110
(
11b
11 Pt B
):
E778
82
.
[PubMed]
1464-4096
8.
Schilling
D
,
de Reijke
T
,
Tombal
B
,
de la Taille
A
,
Hennenlotter
J
,
Stenzl
A
.
The Prostate Cancer gene 3 assay: indications for use in clinical practice
.
BJU Int
.
2010
Feb
;
105
(
4
):
452
5
.
[PubMed]
1464-4096
9.
Nickel
JC
,
True
LD
,
Krieger
JN
,
Berger
RE
,
Boag
AH
,
Young
ID
.
Consensus development of a histopathological classification system for chronic prostatic inflammation
.
BJU Int
.
2001
Jun
;
87
(
9
):
797
805
.
[PubMed]
1464-4096
10.
de la Taille
A
,
Irani
J
,
Graefen
M
,
Chun
F
,
de Reijke
T
,
Kil
P
, et al.
Clinical evaluation of the PCA3 assay in guiding initial biopsy decisions
.
J Urol
.
2011
Jun
;
185
(
6
):
2119
25
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
11.
Raja
N
,
Russell
CM
,
George
AK
.
Urinary markers aiding in the detection and risk stratification of prostate cancer
.
Transl Androl Urol
.
2018
Sep
;
7
(
S4
Suppl 4
):
S436
42
.
[PubMed]
2223-4683
12.
Deras
IL
,
Aubin
SM
,
Blase
A
,
Day
JR
,
Koo
S
,
Partin
AW
, et al.
PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome
.
J Urol
.
2008
Apr
;
179
(
4
):
1587
92
.
[PubMed]
0022-5347
13.
Todenhöfer
T
,
Hennenlotter
J
,
Kühs
U
,
Tews
V
,
Gakis
G
,
Aufderklamm
S
, et al.
Influence of urinary tract instrumentation and inflammation on the performance of urine markers for the detection of bladder cancer
.
Urology
.
2012
Mar
;
79
(
3
):
620
4
.
[PubMed]
0090-4295
14.
De Luca
S
,
Passera
R
,
Fiori
C
,
Bollito
E
,
Cappia
S
,
Mario Scarpa
R
,
Sottile
A
,
Franco Randone
D
,
Porpiglia
F
: Prostate health index and prostate cancer gene 3 score but not percent-free Prostate Specific Antigen have a predictive role in differentiating histological prostatitis from PCa and other nonneoplastic lesions (BPH and HG-PIN) at repeat biopsy. Urol Oncol
2015
;33:424 e417-423.
15.
De Luca
S
,
Passera
R
,
Bollito
E
,
Manfredi
M
,
Scarpa
RM
,
Sottile
A
, et al.
Comparison of prostate cancer gene 3 score, prostate health index and percentage free prostate-specific antigen for differentiating histological inflammation from prostate cancer and other non-neoplastic alterations of the prostate at initial biopsy
.
Anticancer Res
.
2014
Dec
;
34
(
12
):
7159
65
.
[PubMed]
1791-7530
16.
Bussemakers
MJ
,
van Bokhoven
A
,
Verhaegh
GW
,
Smit
FP
,
Karthaus
HF
,
Schalken
JA
, et al.
DD3: a new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer
.
Cancer Res
.
1999
Dec
;
59
(
23
):
5975
9
.
[PubMed]
0008-5472
17.
Meng
FJ
,
Shan
A
,
Jin
L
,
Young
CY
.
The expression of a variant prostate-specific antigen in human prostate
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
.
2002
Mar
;
11
(
3
):
305
9
.
[PubMed]
1055-9965
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.